Blaise Bicknell vs Keegan Rice Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

Wojtek Kolan
Published on 04 Jul at 06:53 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
B. Bicknell vs K. Rice

JAM
1
Win
Played
0
Win

CAN
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Bicknell 1 - 0 Rice
They have played 2 sets in total, with Blaise Bicknell winning 2 and Keegan Rice winning 0. The last match between Blaise Bicknell and Keegan Rice was at the M25 Laval, 04-07-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Hard, with Blaise Bicknell getting the victory 6-3 6-4.
Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
---|---|
Bicknell | 1 |
Rice | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M25 Laval(07-04-25)
B. Bicknell vs K. Rice H2H Profile
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
$0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
56.59% (116-89) | Career Total W/L | 46.67% (14-16) |
1 | Hard | 0 |
3 | Titles | 0 |
1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
B. Bicknell vs K. Rice Match Preview:
- How well do Rice and Bicknell perform on their second serve? In the last 6 months, Rice has won 38.28% of points on their second serve, whereas Bicknell has a slight edge at 40.47%.
- When it comes to return games, Rice has secured 46.37% of points on the opponent's second serve, while Bicknell leads slightly with 46.72%.
- In terms of first serve returns, Rice has achieved a 32.93% success rate, narrowly surpassing Bicknell, who stands at 32.77%.
- Under pressure, Rice has saved 37.66% of breakpoints, but Bicknell performs significantly better, saving 51.56% of breakpoints.
- Considering their overall match performance in the last year, Rice has a higher win rate, winning 69.23% of matches compared to Bicknell's 41.67%.
- Both players excel on hard courts. Rice has a 56% win rate, while Bicknell holds a slight advantage with 60%.
- Rice tends to dominate at lower-tier events, winning 81.82% of matches in Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, whereas Bicknell plays more Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, with a 38.46% win rate.
- Rice has faced tougher opponents, with an average opponent ranking of 152.54, while Bicknell's opponents average a rank of 354.71.
- In matches that go to a deciding set, Rice has won 50% of the time, holding a clear advantage over Bicknell, who has only won 29%.
- Rice has converted 46.67% of breakpoint opportunities recently, outperforming Bicknell's 40% conversion rate.
Editorial Prediction (July 4, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Rice and Bicknell presents an intriguing dynamic, where performance consistency and match pressure could play pivotal roles. Both players show proficiency on hard courts, yet Bicknell has a slight statistical edge in winning percentage on this surface.
Rice's experience against higher-ranked opponents and superior performance in converting breakpoints suggest a mental and tactical advantage. Their ability to hold under pressure is a potential decider, especially when considering Bicknell's stronger breakpoint saving statistic.
Given Rice's stronger recent overall performance and conversion capabilities, alongside their ability to maintain composure in deciding sets, they could hold the upper hand. Thus, based on the current data, Rice might be the more likely candidate to win this upcoming tennis match.
Blaise Bicknell vs Keegan Rice Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
B. Bicknell vs K. Rice H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
2 | Sets Won | 0 |
12 | Games Won | 7 |
1 | Aces (Total) | 0 |
2 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
1:33:35 | Average Match Time | 1:33:35 |
73% (51/70) | 1st Serve % | 60% (36/60) |
57% (29/51) | 1st Serve Win % | 58% (21/36) |
63% (12/19) | 2nd Serve Win % | 42% (10/24) |
50% (3/6) | Break Pts Won % | 11% (1/9) |
48% (29/60) | Return Points Win % | 41% (29/70) |
100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
B. Bicknell Recent Matches Played
K. Rice Recent Matches Played

B. Bicknell vs K. Rice Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
Stats | ||
---|---|---|
56.59% (116/89) | YTD Win/Loss | 46.67% (14/16) |
55.84% (263/208) | Sets Win/Loss | 47.69% (31/34) |
51.88% (2316/2148) | Games Win/Loss | 49.20% (276/285) |
61.11% (77/49) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.17% (13/11) |
52.05% (38/35) | Clay Win/Loss | 33.33% (1/2) |
16.67% (1/5) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0.00% (0/3) |
0.24 | Aces Per Game | 0.12 |
531 | Aces Total | 34 |
0.29 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
633 | Total Double Faults | 88 |
1:25:35 | Average Match Time | 1:23:35 |
426.13 | Average Opponent Rank | 310.27 |
65% (7949/12286) | 1st Serve % | 60% (974/1626) |
67% (5363/7949) | 1st Serve Win % | 63% (618/974) |
50% (2174/4336) | 2nd Serve Win % | 40% (261/652) |
43% (491/1131) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 48% (71/149) |
39% (4704/12003) | Return Points Win % | 42% (661/1585) |
0.00% (0/1) | Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) |
40.00% (2/3) | Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) |
47.37% (36/40) | Challenger W/L | 22.22% (2/7) |
63.41% (78/45) | Futures W/L | 57.14% (12/9) |
57% (112/197) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 47% (14/30) |
0% (0/1) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
50% (32/64) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 75% (3/4) |
49% (33/67) | Deciding Set Win % | 40% (2/5) |
82% (119/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 93% (14/13) |
18% (119/22) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 7% (14/1) |
22% (86/19) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (16/1) |